Dating a rock Akhi alamgir sexually harassed on a live chat show
The periods of relative quiet contribute only a small part of the record.
…The charge that the construction of the geologic scale involves circularity has a certain amount of validity….
(Some of the following quotes are as cited in Morris, 1997 and Snelling, 1990).
The series of quotes begins with a vivid illustration of this circular reasoning in action.
10, 2010.) “In about 1830, Charles Lyell, Paul Deshayes, and Heinrich George Bronn independently developed a biostratigraphic technique [geologic column] for dating Cenozoic deposits based on relative proportions of living and extinct species of fossil mollusks….
This approach avoids the circularity associated with using fossils to correlate rocks, and then using those correlations to infer biological patterns…” (“Cambrian Explosion: New Timeline for Appearances of Skeletal Animals in Fossil Record,” , Nov.The weakness of evolutionary theory can be demonstrated by the tautologies and circular reasoning that is employed to provide “evidence” for large scale evolution.Even many evolutionists ruefully admit that this charge is undeniable with regard to the circularity invoked in dating rock layers.Thus, the procedure is far from ideal and the geologic ranges of fossils are constantly being revised (usually extended) as new occurrences are found. ” (Raup, David M., “Geology and Creationism,” , vol. 21.) “The sedimentary rocks, by themselves, however, do not yield any specific time marks, setting aside the old law of superposition, which can provide relative age indication only in a restricted manner, and which is unfit for age correlations.Moreover, it may be misleading in some cases: the beds in a section may be overturned or, owing to a hidden thrust plane, older beds may overlie younger ones.